Key Concepts

Trust in Systems of People

Systems of People / Trust / What is trust?

Trust is often described as a feeling. Other times it is treated as a judgment based on evidence of competence, reliability, or shared interest.
Research across psychology, sociology, economics, and organizational studies suggests both are true.

Trust includes emotion and judgment.
It is experienced personally, but shaped by the relationships and systems around us.

What Trust Is and Isn’t

Trust is often described as a feeling. Other times it is treated as a judgment based on evidence of competence, reliability, or shared interest. Research across psychology, sociology, economics, and organizational studies shows that both are true. Trust includes emotion and judgment. It involves care and credibility. It is experienced personally, but shaped by the relationships and systems around us.

At its simplest, trust is a willingness to accept vulnerability in the presence of uncertainty. To trust is not to remove risk, but to move forward despite it—because we believe another person, group, or institution is unlikely to cause harm and may act with our interests in mind.

Because vulnerability and uncertainty are always present in systems of people, trust is never fixed. It develops through repeated signals of honesty, reliability, and care. It can deepen through shared experience and mutual risk-taking. It can also erode—slowly through neglect or quickly through betrayal, confusion, or sustained pressure that overwhelms people’s capacity to show up well.

It is equally important to understand what trust is not.

Trust is not blind optimism or the absence of accountability. In healthy systems, trust and clear expectations reinforce each other. Trust is also not the same as agreement, comfort, or politeness. People can disagree, hold high standards, and still operate with strong trust. And while trust feels personal, it is not created by intention alone. Structures, incentives, leadership behavior, and shared norms all influence whether trust can grow or survive.

Seen clearly, trust is best understood as a relational condition that enables cooperation, learning, repair, and coordinated action over time. When trust is present, many other positive outcomes become possible. When it is absent, even strong strategies or capable individuals struggle to sustain progress.

Clearer understanding does not remove complexity.
But it makes thoughtful action possible.

And in systems of people, that clarity is often the first step toward steadier ground.

When stress rises across a system, what erodes first: competence, or care?

How much relational depth is required for trust to survive sustained uncertainty?

Questions we’re left with

You’ve got the pilots and co-pilots, I help with the navigation.